<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flexion.Org Blog &#187; comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.flexion.org/tag/comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.flexion.org</link>
	<description>Bad grammar and typos for total strangers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:12:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Mediatomb vs. MiniDLNA</title>
		<link>http://blog.flexion.org/2009/12/18/mediatomb-minidlna/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.flexion.org/2009/12/18/mediatomb-minidlna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio & Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediatomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MiniDLNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UPnP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[versus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flexion.org/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been using Mediatomb for nearly two years now but I decided to give MiniDLNA a whirl since it is a fully fledged DLNA server whereas Mediatomb is UPnP only. I am currently running both Mediatomb SVN and MiniDLNA CVS. So, how does MiniDLNA compare to Mediatomb? MiniDLNA is easier to compile, configure, uses [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content" style="float:right;"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-vertical"><g:plusone size="tall" href="http://blog.flexion.org/2009/12/18/mediatomb-minidlna/"></g:plusone></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-vertical"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://blog.flexion.org/2009/12/18/mediatomb-minidlna/&amp;layout=box_count&amp;show_faces=false&amp;width=&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;height=65" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:px !important; height:65px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-vertical"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blog.flexion.org/2009/12/18/mediatomb-minidlna/" data-text="Mediatomb vs. MiniDLNA" data-count="vertical" data-via="@flexiondotorg" data-related="@flexiondotorg"><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-vertical"><script type="in/share" data-url="http://blog.flexion.org/2009/12/18/mediatomb-minidlna/" data-counter="top"></script></div></div><p>I have been using Mediatomb for nearly two years now but I decided to give MiniDLNA a whirl since it is a fully fledged DLNA server whereas Mediatomb is UPnP only. I am currently running both Mediatomb SVN and MiniDLNA CVS. So, how does MiniDLNA compare to Mediatomb?</p>
<ul>
<li>MiniDLNA is easier to compile, configure, uses less RAM and has less software dependencies than Mediatomb.</li>
<li>MiniDLNA doesn&#8217;t currently support music play lists or Last.fm scrobbling. Mediatomb supports .m3u and .pls playlists but requires a 3rd party patch to add Last.fm scrobbling.</li>
<li>MiniDLNA doesn&#8217;t support dynamic video thumbnail creation, which would be nice to have but is not essential, cover images are supported. Mediatomb supports video thumbnailing via ffmpegthumbnailer.</li>
<li>MiniDLNA doesn&#8217;t currently have any transcoding support. This is of little consequence for me since I import video content into my library in a format natively supported by the PS3, either MP3, MPEG-2 TS or MPEG-4. Mediatomb does support transcoding but it is somewhat fiddly to setup and you can&#8217;t pause transcoded content.</li>
<li>MiniDLNA works <em>&#8220;out of the box&#8221;</em> with the PS3 (and other DLNA clients) while Mediatomb requires some tweaking.</li>
<li>Mediatomb&#8217;s default video import script doesn&#8217;t suit how I organise my video library, but MiniDLNA fit my video library perfectly.</li>
</ul>
<p>So, as of today I am running both Mediatomb and MiniDLNA. Mediatomb is exclusively handling audio since playlist and Last.fm support are essential for me. MiniDLNA is now handling video exclusively. I&#8217;m very happy with the results but should MiniDLNA add .m3u/.pls play lists and Last.fm support I will switch everything to MiniDLNA <img src='http://blog.flexion.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written up my notes on installing Mediatomb SVN (including Last.fm support) and MiniDLNA CVS on Ubuntu Karmic 9.10 Server, get them from the links below&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://wiki.flexion.org/DLNAServer.html" target="_self">MiniDLNA </a></li>
<li><a href="http://wiki.flexion.org/UPnPServer.html" target="_self">Mediatomb </a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.flexion.org/2009/12/18/mediatomb-minidlna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

